Showing posts with label actor training. Show all posts
Showing posts with label actor training. Show all posts

Thursday, March 5, 2015

Theatre Program "Best of" lists and what we can learn from them.


Theatre Programs: Best of lists and what can we learn from them?

Lately I’ve been reading a lot lists about the “top,” or the “best,” theatre training programs for both BFA and BA students.

These lists make my stomach churn more than a little. I often wonder how a single writer can look at every program in the country? How solid is their research? How do they prepare their lists? Do schools that have excellent PR firms rank better? I have a lot of questions and they provide very little in the way of answers.

These lists get re-blogged and reposted all across the Internet. I freely admit my own complicity in this as I re-blog/tweet/Facebook post every one of these lists that comes my way.

What I love most about them is when a little known or little publicly appreciated program receives its moment in the sun and makes one of these lists. It makes one feel as if the underdog can win, that the little guy can take on a giant.

I decided to dig into these lists and see what makes them tick and it was interesting what I learned. I looked at the lists of these schools and asked myself what do all of these “best” programs have in common? I took each school and looked at what they themselves say about their own programs. Then I looked at the similarities or commonalities among the “top."

Well, this is what I learned . . .

1.) Nearly every top program has some sort of weekly meeting for the whole department. Some call it Drama Forum, others call it Theatre Lab but they all do it in some manner. They use it as a way to come together each week (some with less frequency but they still do it at least once a month) and showcase student work, make announcements, discuss new developments, present guest speakers, even professors can present work in progress, etc. Many of these programs also make it an open forum to discuss issues, policy changes; they create a space to truly have a dialogue with their student population and community.

I know there will be naysayers about this practice, “Student’s won’t show up, attendance was low, faculty don’t want to commit the time.” Tough, I don’t care. Trying to implement a new policy or practice once will never make it successful. Try it for a whole academic year. Make it the same time and the same day each week. I dare you. Invite student groups to makes announcements, bring in a speaker, and commit to some programming. Also always have a flyer up and make it clear that it’s a way for new members to the theatre community to introduce themselves and learn more.

Some people may say, “But we can’t afford speakers.” Wrong, if you look, they are there. Even if you don’t live near a major city there’s no reason you can’t bring in the stage manager of the big show coming through the local roadhouse. Offer to buy them dinner and a great cup of coffee and I bet they would love to speak with your students for half an hour to 45 minutes, all you have to do is ask. Doing things like that strengthens ties with the professional world and spreads through word of mouth great things about your department.

2.) Engagement in some form of new work - sometimes it’s ten-minute plays written by the students, sometimes it’s a new musical, others times it can be a guest artist brought in to develop a new piece, but they all do it in some manner.

3.) Bridges to the professional world - every “successful” program does this and some do it on multiple fronts. For some schools its internships and externships with casting directors, agents, managers, theatres, and production companies. Many of these schools have built relationships with these folks over the years so that way it’s easy to place their students, the professionals know what to expect and what the level of education is that these interns have.

Some schools go through a traditional showcase process. Some of the really successful programs have internships and a showcase. Or you could take the route of a school like Elon University. Instead of bringing 16-24 students to NYC and Los Angeles they bring industry professionals to North Carolina, have them watch a showcase, evaluate each of the students, provide feedback to each of them, and then teach workshops for a few days about the profession and working as an actor.

I found Elon’s approach interesting because of the savings it provides. If you are a program far from NYC or Los Angeles, or an airline hub, it’s much cheaper to bring a handful of professionals to your school. Especially after you factor in airfare, hotels and meals. There might even be funds present at your university or college to bring in guest speakers.

Of course, there is no substitute for traveling to and experiencing a city. I know of past students who would never have moved to Los Angeles unless they had visited it as part of the showcase process first.

Some programs build real world relationships by hiring working directors and designers to come in and direct their students and design their shows. Smart schools bring in directors and designers with strong ties to regional theatres. And remember, everybody likes to have an assistant.

And lastly, some schools have working ties with regional theatres. What you have to be careful about is students never getting to play leads and they spend their time in ensemble or background roles. One school, such as St. Edwards in Austin, uses an Equity theatre as the on-campus producing center. That means their BFA students get to earn equity points as EMC's while earning their degree. They also then have the opportunity to work alongside professionals from the Austin area. This allows them to grow even more as actors.

Not every school can afford working on an URTA contract. Nor should every program function like that. But there is no harm in reaching out to your local SPT (Small Professional Theatre) and seeing what you can do to help them engage in the Equity Memberships Candidate process and introduce them to your students. Hold a forum with your local AEA rep or SAG-AFTRA rep and educate everyone about how to operate on SPT or SAG ultra low budget contracts. I think everyone can agree that this is a business of relationships. (Heck, I bet your Dramatists Guild Area Liaison would love to speak with your playwriting students.)

4.) Having a plan for your graduates – most schools simply don’t do this. It’s silly how easily this can be incorporated into your capstone courses. I’m not saying your students have to stick to it, but putting the thought into where to move, survival skills, software skills, how to budget and having a written plan in place about how they intend to accomplish their goals is a powerful tool. Hopefully as more schools comply with guidelines from regulatory bodies they will adopt this practice. It truly makes a difference in students, their success rates, and alumni relations and dollars. These plans could be anything, from moving to a new city, attending graduate school, or working in a year long/seasonal fellowship. (Have your students explore Arts Search every spring for opportunities.) The point is, any plan is better than no plan.

5.) Some form of company or class presented work - it seems to bring people together, create a sense of company and community, and allows you to claim you are producing more than you actually are. We all know that NYU Grad presents company shows for each year of the program. A school like Rutgers achieves this in several ways; the BFA’s present work that they have written and created themselves under the title of Performance Ensemble. They do it again by presenting a Shakespeare play as a company that they worked on while studying at The Globe in London. Some schools achieve it through other means; if you have a course in improvisation, present an evening or a weekend of improv before an audience. If you a studying clown, put on a clown show. If your school is finding ways to devise, then present what the class has produced for a weekend. (By the way if your school is not devising or teaching devising, then you are behind the times and that ship has already sailed far away from you.) Another great way to achieve this is presenting ten-minute plays by the directing students.

6.) Production and performance opportunities galore – outside of a few strict conservatories most of the top BA and BFA programs are all about producing as much as possible while maintaining quality. Most schools formally produce at least four productions a season. They build on that by adding in company and class produced work (see point #5), student improv groups, things like No Shame Theatre, a cabaret from their musical theatre students, and most of them have some sort of venue for students to produce and put up work written and directed by themselves. Successful schools create a “second stage” where student led work and classroom work can be presented to a public (and sometimes paying) audience.

What should be number seven, I will put down as an “honorable mention,” is studying abroad. Some programs have a summer, a full semester, even a full year abroad; others have several programs they will transfer all of the credits from. Year after year these schools place students in summer or semester abroad programs at places such as The Moscow Art Theatre, RADA, LAMDA, and BADA.  Some encourage their students to study at places like the O’Neil Theatre Center. Studying at the O’Neil, while not quite abroad, certainly has its advantages. 

There is no reason your program can't adopt some of these ideas and make them your own.

What I feel the need to point out is that much of this has nothing to do with location or money. I once heard a Department Chair tell a room full of educators that his program will never be a top program because it’s too far from an entertainment center such as NYC or Los Angeles. I would tell him that’s a terrible excuse and countless programs have proven him wrong.

I also want to point out that much of this costs little to nothing to implement. Many of the changes can be made with elbow grease and a little gumption. A little effort with your study abroad office and taking the Artistic Director from the local professional theatre can sometimes reap big rewards for your students. Also, little changes in thinking along with tweaking your best practices can go a long way towards building a community, a brand, the success of your students and your program.



Thursday, January 30, 2014

Some thoughts on teaching acting . . .

Teaching at a university whose MFA program that is focused on pedagogy raises lots of interesting questions.

Without a doubt it makes me a better teacher as I have to constantly and consistently answer “why” and “how” in relation to every conversation I have with my graduate students.

Every day is a new examination of the actor training process.

I realize there are three kinds of programs:

1.) Those that teach a technique, adhere to that technique and live in the philosophical world of that technique.

2.) Then there are those programs that teach outcomes. After semester X you will be able to do Y. They don’t care how you get there as a teacher, simply that you get the students there.

3.) And lastly, we have what I call “patchwork” or “hodgepodge.” They teach a bunch of different techniques and approaches and the connective tissue is the performance opportunities and the faculty.

After having been educated in or taught in all three kinds I’m not sure which I prefer.

There are pros and cons to all three.

I will say that having a “technique” allows one the safety of working inside a philosophy or values system that one can always go back to when in doubt about a situation. It shapes an aesthetic. It shapes the artist not only as a student but also as a teacher.

When I was younger I refused to adhere to the aesthetic or philosophy of my teachers and over time I now cling to it. After a decade and a half as a theatre practitioner I have found myself coming back to my roots, embracing the amazing master teachers I have worked with and I have fully realized my value system as an actor and educator.

I was listening to Anne Bogart speak the other night and she said something that stuck with me.  “Actor training in this country has become too easy. It needs to be hard, it needs to take work. It doesn’t matter what you study as long you study it in depth, takes effort to learn it and is hard.”

I couldn’t agree with her more.

That thought should be applied to all of higher education, not simply theatre or actor training. We must stop inflating grades and hold them to a measure of perfection or success. And we must stand by that measure, stand our ground and know that we are serving them.

It’s why I talk to my students about “being excellent.” Excellence is a habit that must be cultivated like love, kindness or compassion. It takes effort to be excellent and it must be practiced.


I challenge them with the idea that why would one choose to be mediocre? Who aims for that? Who wants to simply get by? Why would one choose to be an artist and then aim for enough, aim for passable? That makes no sense to me. I want my students to aspire to be brilliant, to be hungry for it and to never be satisfied with just ok.